The
Real Terrorists
August 7, 2005
What do you expect would happen if you gave a child a loaded weapon?
Almost undoubtedly, at some point, the child would pull the trigger and the gun
would discharge. Anyone standing in front of the barrel would likely be hit.
Many years ago I read Sharon's autobiography, which so describes the
death of his first son, Gur. I haven't looked at the book in many years, and
have little inclination to seek it out. However, to the best of my
recollection, the way Sharon tells it, a friend have little Gur, (about 11
years old), an old rusty gun to play with. Little did he know that the weapon
contained a live bullet. I don't remember if Gur pulled the trigger, or if a
friend of his did so, but the result was that Gur was fatally wounded, and died
almost immediately. The incident was labeled 'an accident.'
But it's clear enough. If you put a gun in the hands of someone not
responsible for his actions, such as a child, tragedy is imminent. And those
responsible, whether their act was intentional or unintentional, are the people
who allowed the weapon to reach the little fingers of the little boy or girl.
The child cannot be held responsible for 'killing,' rather the parents or
anyone else who didn't take the necessary safety precautions.
A few months ago a 19-year old named Eden Natan-Zada was drafted into
the Israeli army, as are most young Israel men. Natan-Zada underwent the usual
proceedings, which includes a personal interview. For some reason, the
interviewer saw fit to send him to an additional interview, this time with an
army psychologist. That person, following the interview, recommended that Eden
Natan-Zada receive a psychological profile of 45, which would forbid him from
carrying a weapon, and that his military service be closely accompanied by an
army psychologist.
These recommendations were ignored. Natan-Zada began a regular army
basic training course, which, after a short period of time, he deserted.
According to his parents, they informed military police where their son was,
warned them, and pleaded with them, to find him and take his rifle from him.
These pleas went unheard. The result was Eden Natan-Zada's attack and murder of
four Arabs last Thursday.
Now, I ask you – who was responsible for Eden Natan-Zada's attack? This
young man, mentally unstable, who was 'marked' by military psychologists,
should never have handled a weapon. An automatic rifle should never have been
placed in his hands. The only real difference between Eden Natan-Zada and Gur
Sharon was their age. The result of Gur Sharon's loaded gun, was his own death.
The result of Natan-Zada's loaded gun was his own death, together with four
other people. Clearly, neither one of them should have had a gun, and clearly,
both of them should still be alive today. Clearly, the criminal negligence of
others led to the tragic results in both cases.
However, too many others, led by Israeli cabinet ministers and the
Israeli media, fail to understand simple facts of life. Israeli radio,
television and newspapers are full of vicious accounts of the 'Jewish
terrorist.' Eden Natan-Zada has been labeled a 'mechabel' – a terrorist, in
the same category as the worst of Jew murderers from Hamas, the Islamic Jihad,
Fatah, and others. What hypocracy!
Such an act clearly cannot be condoned. Shooting people is not a
solution to the problems faced by Israeli society, whether they be the
conflicts between Israelis and Israelis, or the conflict between Jews and
Arabs, between Israel and the Arabs. In fact, despite the fact that thousands
of Israelis are legally armed, (including most residents of Judea, Samaria and
Gaza), the number of Jews who have taken the law into their own hands is
miniscule. And this, despite the thousands of Jews attacked, wounded, maimed
and murdered by Arabs, year after year. However, random killing of innocent
people is wrong and perpetrators must be apprehended, tried and punished. Of
course, preferably such attacks should not occur in the first place.
But to compare a clearly mentally unstable 19-year old with bloodthirsty
terrorists, to label him a mechabel, is outrageous. Israeli hysteria reached
such proportions that: Defense Minister Mufaz forbad Natan-Zada's burial in a
military cemetery, Central Command General Yair Naveh forbade his burial
anywhere in Judea and Samaria, and the Rishon l'Tzion mayor, (where he had
lived and where his family lives), forbad his burial in that city. The funeral
should have taken place on Friday, but the family had no where to bury their
son (who too, was murdered by crazed, rioting Arabs.) The father, interviewed
on Israeli radio, was told on Friday afternoon, at the morgue, that 'the body
belongs to the state' and that 'he should leave before the police arrest him.'
Only this morning was an agreement reached, allowing the family to bury
their son, sometime today, in Rishon l'Tzion.
Clearly, Israeli politicians are standing on their heads in order to
appease the Arabs living in Israel. They are petrified that, due to the murder
of four Arabs by an Israeli, the entire Arab population will rise up and
revolt. This, in and of itself, isn't so bad. The problem is that it could
delay the planned expulsion/abandonment of Gush Katif and the northern Shomron.
Sharon wants to avoid that at all costs. According to media accounts, Sharon
himself called the families of the murder victims to personally console them. I
wonder - when was the last time Sharon called Jewish family members of murdered
Arab terror victims?
The other aspect, which was all but ignored until this morning, is the
fact that Eden Natan-Zada was murdered after being apprehended and neutralized
by Israeli police. Can you image the headlines in the Israeli daily press if… ARAB
MURDERED BY JEWISH EXTREMISTS FOLLOWING TERROR ATTACK. The Jewish victims would have been quickly
forgotten – all that would be spoken and written about would center on the
brutal, lawless, lynch of an Arab. FIND THE MURDERERS, INVESTIGATIVE
COMMITTEES, ADMINISTRATION DETENTION, EXTREMISTS, EXTREMISTS, EXTREMISTS. That's all we would have heard, were the case
reversed. This morning the media is starting, slowly, to relate to the issue.
During one radio interview it was stressed that the police would begin an
'investigation' because 'police were attacked, hit by rocks and had gasoline
poured on them.' They forgot to mention that the attacker himself was murdered
– that the police were 'unable' to prevent his killing.
There are those who are traveling back in a time tunnel to the days of
Yoram Skolnick, who shot and killed a captured terrorist who had planned on
killing children in a Hebron Hills regional school. Skolnick spent many years
in jail. But we need not go back so far.
What about the supposed 'lynch' of an Arab a few weeks ago, in Gush
Katif. Shimshon Cytrin is being accused of attempted murder, etc. etc. when it
crystal clear that just about everything attributed to him did not happen.
This is the classic Israeli double standard. Kick yourself as hard as
you can, even though you don’t deserve it, and 'make nice' to the enemy,
appease him, and maybe he'll leave you alone. Or at least, he won't take
revenge. As if they need any excuses.
These events – Natan-Zada, Gush Katif and the Northern Shomron, Cytrin,
and other such atrocities are all symptoms of the sickness which has invaded
our collective body, and is eating at us from inside. Eden Natan-Zada was not a
terrorist – he was a victim of real terror – terror initiated by Ariel Sharon
and his cronies. They are responsible for the last week's attack – they are the
essence of the cancer destroying the State of Israel. They are the real
terrorists.
No comments:
Post a Comment